[caption id="" align="alignright" width="225" caption="霜花店 Frozen Flower"]
[/caption]The film A Frozen Flower (I will disregard how unpoetic this sounds), which was released in South Korea in 2008, was recommended to me by a good friend of mine. Since I liked the King and the Clown and thought this to be along the same vein, I went ahead and started it. Note, started it (did not finish it).Jo In-sung... I don't understand why people consider him one of the most beautiful men in S. Korea. Ok, yes, he's good looking, but... pretty? Beautiful? Anyway, different taste. Ju Jin-mo's acting blew me away. A Tony Leung see-everything-in-his-eyes-don't-you-dare-blink style actor that really looks good on screen. Nice combination of looks and talent. The only female main character Song Ji-hyo... dude, are facial expressions so difficult?My main complaint is the PLOT! I'm all for pretty eyecandy, but I am not a fan of tagging something as a "struggle with ones homosexuality" but when you watch the film you start wondering if you're watching an AV movie... there's a slight issue. I don't even know how so much sexual content was allowed onto the big screen in Korea. Not that I care, I made it through Lust*Caution (which... I shall refrain from commenting on). But really, more artfully done would have been nice. You don't need to rotate 10 different position to demonstrate that the two were craving each other physically.In general, I have issues with movies that have too much skin for too little effect. Skin is fine. But skin for the sake of skin is simply not my taste and when I have to make it through 20+ minutes of it... *yawn* What a waste of a potentially beautiful lyrical film and a lovely title.I saw ads for this movie all over HK when I was there... I wonder how it did.Although knowing me, I'll probably end up shortening his (yes my netbook is a "he", ahem) name to "L" or "Spocky" or "GG" or the like... >_<
*Namesake, as defined in the OED, can be used both for the name giver and the name receiver (yes, I like the OED).
I knew I shouldn't have tried to watch a French film....
[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="230" caption="Vidocq"] [/caption]I've never claimed to be cultured. In fact, many of my friends know I stay away from artsy fartsy places... and the same goes for movies. French movies are tricky. On the one hand, they tend to be artsy by definition, but there are also beauties like Amélie and some years ago I watched District B13 and was blown away by the action and art direction. Besides, the movie was about Vidocq and I'm a real sucker for detectives and mysteries in general (that's why I'm *so* looking forward to this) so I bit the bullet and watched the movie.I'll skip the background since there've been complaints about my posts being too long...The visuals are amazing and undoubtedly French. The movie reeked of glamorous decadence from minute one and the rich revolving colors are a feast for the eyes (though for my motion-sickness challenged self it was a bit disorienting). The voluptuous ladies and gorgeous costumes made a definitive point about the stark contrast between the culture (high society) and the political/actual situation at the time, one of the most turbulent moments in French history.But the plot... GEEZ... I'm a big fan of everything coming together nicely, but not when everything falls into place a little *too* easily. And...*spoiler alert*... I don't see the point of getting a bunch of people killed to lure the culprit to you when you KNOW who the murderer is!I understand that the movie needs to go on... and if it wasn't quite set up the way it was, then we wouldn't have even had a movie. But I think what turned me off the most is the fact that there's supernatural powers involved. I'm not against using superpowers. In fact, I'm a huge fan. But it takes all the fun out of the mystery part if you find out at the end that there was no scientifically coherent way to explain the event and so they went the easy way out and explained it all by this masterful plot that involves the ancient Chinese superstition of using young virgins to feed your own vitality (and no, this isn't a joke, the dude was actually successful) - WHA?!*/spoiler alert*There's a saying in Chinese, 掛羊頭賣狗肉. False advertising (literally hanging a lamb's head while selling dog meat - barf). I loved Sherlock Holmes because for all his mysterious ways, there's always a very logical answer to seemingly impossible questions. Even for things like Iron Man and Hulk, they use somewhat plausible explanations for their respective sources of power. This was all lacking in the movie. Loose ends were NOT tied up and honestly, there was not much suspense in the whole thing and this was a mystery movie! Puh. Never trust hype.*spoiler alert * *spoiler alert * *spoiler alert * If you really didn’t want any spoilers you shouldn’t be on this page *spoiler alert * *spoiler alert * *spoiler alert *
Ok, so I finally decided to go see Watchmen. I’ve heard a lot of views from people who really liked it or who really disliked it… mostly people I know didn’t like it. But since I read the comic just so I can actually go see it and know what’s going on, I wasn’t going to quit without trying… so I gave it a chance.First of all I’m going to let it out of my system: *fangirl prancing around and chanting* Billy Crudup Rorschach Billy Crudup Rorschach Billy Crudup Rorschach Billy Crudup Rorschach~~~*turns back to normal (?) mode*Needless to stress, I was very much pleasantly surprised by this film.So I’ve realized that NYT isn’t the ideal spot to get a decent movie review, but my exposure and time are both limited and I really didn’t feel like going rottentomatoes. Here was a snippet from the review that worried me, A.O. Scott:“Indeed, the ideal viewer — or reviewer, as the case may be — of the “Watchmen” movie would probably be a mid-’80s college sophomore with a smattering of Nietzsche, an extensive record collection and a comic-book nerd for a roommate.”
Ok, granted I had my share of Nietzsche (and yes, a roommie who was an English major with an extensive music collection though I admit I was the comic book nerd), but that doesn’t mean I want to sit through 2 ½ hours of Nietzsche. I find Nietzsche and Machiavelli both fascinating and an often refreshing break from the mass of post modern societal fragmentation theorists - but in limited doses because I find that most interesting philosophies tend to be depressing ones. I avoided reading most of the other reviews because I find myself disagreeing with them mostly and don’t intend on turning my review into one to rebuke all of the other reviews out there. My review is only to speak my own views. Comic book devotees and nay sayers need not respond (read). I’m perfectly fine with you hating me in your own heads.
歸去,也無風雨也無晴。
Walking the Fool's Journey.